Compare two rental properties on annual cash, leveraged net yield, and a simplified total return.
The frame below runs the same code as this page, in the reader's own browser. Nothing is sent to us, and nothing is sent to you.
Pick a dark background and the text and panels follow it, so the frame stays readable on a dark page.
For each property, annual rent loses running costs and 12 mortgage payments before cash flow is divided by purchase price for net yield. Assumed appreciation is then added to yield for total return; costs, finance, and growth default to 0 rather than being inferred.
A price: 180000 A monthly rent: 950 A annual running costs: 1200 A monthly mortgage payment: 400 A appreciation percent: 2 B price: 220000 B monthly rent: 1300 B annual running costs: 1800 B monthly mortgage payment: 650 B appreciation percent: 3
A net annual cash flow: 5400 A net yield percent: 3 A total return percent: 5 B net annual cash flow: 6000 B net yield percent: 2.73 B total return percent: 5.73 Higher cash flow: B Higher yield: A Higher total return: B
Buy-to-let shortlists, landlord portfolio reviews, and investment memos compare absolute cash, price-relative income, and a separate capital-growth scenario.